Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz at Tracy Williams, Ltd.

With “Hourglass,” a new series of large-scale drawings, Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz extends her  interest in textiles into a full-in exploration of pattern as a mode of metaphysical inquiry. Mumtaz reduces her ornate shapes and designs—many based on decoration she encountered while living in Lahore, Pakistan and New Mexico—to their minimal bones, enlarging their often intricate labyrinths into sizeable drawings that range in scale from about 60-by-40-inches to as much as 103-by-72. The geometric designs often focus around a central point or space that beckons simultaneously inward and outward, appearing both as the source of the pattern and a path beyond it. The seeming outcome of the artist’s use of drawing as a meditative tool, the drawings also invite the viewer to engage with them in a similarly intimate way. This invitation comes addressed on sheets of hand-made paper, the bottoms of which curl into the viewer’s space and tempt him or her with their tactile surfaces.

Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz, "Waxing Crescent," 2011. Graphite on handmade paper.

This new series grows out of Mumtaz’s earlier work, which was similarly large-scale and labor-intensive. Now, the artist’s abstracted excerpts of text have given way to fully abstract shapes. The nesting rectangles and notched forms unavoidably recall Frank Stella, not to mention the kind of labyrinthine patterns associated with a breadth of ancient cultures. But the drawings rarely come off as derivative. Instead, they propose a universal graphic language that presents a public face without sacrificing its private content.

Some advance this proposal more successfully than others:  the graphite designs in Waxing Crescent, 2011 or Station, 2012, are so generic that they displace the artist’s subjectivity almost completely. Cool and geometric, they appear at odds with the warm, tactile surface of the paper on which they’re drawn. At the other end, the two works on hand-dyed cowhide, Burial of 2011 and Novitiate of 2012, let their sensual surface dominate too strongly. The pattern and buttery hide merge so fully that the drawings end up resembling cheap tourist reproductions rather than anything authentic.

Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz, "Novitate," 2012. Hand dyed cowhide.

Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz, "North," 2011. Acrylic on handmade paper 77 1/4 x 59 1/4 in.

When she works with color, however, Mumtaz is much better off. The colored dyes and paint interact with the paper in more noticeable ways than the graphite. In Awake, Sleeper, 2012, a rich, navy dye accentuates the sensual surface of the paper into which it absorbed. Somewhat contrastingly, the works in acrylic, like Observatory, 2011, contain solid forms, layered to the point of smooth opacity, that obstinately sit atop the surface. This effect is even more pronounced in North, 2011, where the hyper-brightness of the sky blue induces an almost hallucinatory push-and-pull with the natural hue of the paper. These different interplays between medium and surface draw attention away from the work’s final design back toward the process of labor that went into making it. As moments of acceptance and denial, acquiescence and refusal, they evidence the epiphanies and pitfalls of spiritual inquiry.

The unfortunate thing is that Mumtaz’s work may just be too en vogue: her geometric patterns are currently on trend in commercial spheres that lay far afield of her eschalogical concerns. While this may attract attention to Mumtaz’s work, it further displaces the artist’s presence, putting her abstract language at the risk of seeming detached and even insincere.  When her presence comes through, however, the works effectively attest to the continued possibility of spiritual discovery, precisely in the face of such commodification.

Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz at Tracy Williams, Ltd. Installation view.

“Hourglass” is open at Tracy Williams Ltd. from March 22 to April 26, 2012. All images courtesy the artist and Tracy Williams Ltd.

Link: Alyssa Pheobus Mumtaz at Tracy Williams Ltd.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. Ravenna Taylor · · Reply

    Nicely drawn review. I saw the show last week and enjoyed the installation and most of the works very much – the scale surprised me, in a good way. I agree about the works on hide.

    1. I like your use of the word “surprising.” It accurately conveys the type of instant impression that Mumtaz’s translation of such intricate designs into a large format creates. There’s an immediate shock, but like you said, in a good way, because it leads to a feeling of intrigue. I think the hand-crafted quality of the paper is a significant factor in keeping this intrigue from slipping into confrontation. Thanks for your comment!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: